You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Induction of apoptosis in B16‐BL6 melanoma cells following exposure to electromagnetic fields modeled after intercellular calcium waves
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
FEBS Open Bio, February 2024
|
| DOI | 10.1002/2211-5463.13760 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Benjamin D. Rain, Adam D. Plourde‐Kelly, Robert M. Lafrenie, Blake T. Dotta |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 27 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 7% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 7% |
| Australia | 1 | 4% |
| Malaysia | 1 | 4% |
| Poland | 1 | 4% |
| Norway | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 19 | 70% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 22 | 81% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 11% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 7% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 March 2024.
All research outputs
#1,958,291
of 25,878,862 outputs
Outputs from FEBS Open Bio
#27
of 1,737 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,461
of 355,046 outputs
Outputs of similar age from FEBS Open Bio
#1
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,878,862 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,737 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 355,046 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.