↓ Skip to main content

Consumption and acceptability of whole grain staples for lowering markers of diabetes risk among overweight and obese Tanzanian adults

Overview of attention for article published in Globalization and Health, June 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
109 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Consumption and acceptability of whole grain staples for lowering markers of diabetes risk among overweight and obese Tanzanian adults
Published in
Globalization and Health, June 2013
DOI 10.1186/1744-8603-9-26
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alfa Muhihi, Dorothy Gimbi, Marina Njelekela, Emmanuel Shemaghembe, Kissah Mwambene, Faraja Chiwanga, Vasanti S Malik, Nicole M Wedick, Donna Spiegelman, Frank B Hu, Walter C Willett

Abstract

Dietary changes characterized by a reduction in carbohydrate quality are occurring in developing countries and may be associated with a higher prevalence of obesity and chronic diseases such as type 2 diabetes mellitus. We assessed the preferences and acceptability of unrefined whole grain carbohydrate staples (i.e., brown rice, unrefined maize and unrefined sorghum ugali) as substitutes for commonly consumed refined carbohydrates in Tanzania.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 109 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 107 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 16 15%
Student > Master 13 12%
Researcher 12 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 9%
Other 6 6%
Other 20 18%
Unknown 32 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 33 30%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 8%
Social Sciences 6 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 4%
Other 15 14%
Unknown 32 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 September 2013.
All research outputs
#14,915,476
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Globalization and Health
#974
of 1,226 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#112,627
of 209,362 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Globalization and Health
#13
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,226 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.1. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 209,362 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.