The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 33 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
How do cytopathologists learn fine needle aspiration techniques? An international survey
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cytopathology, December 2023
|
DOI | 10.1111/cyt.13352 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Eduardo Alcaraz‐Mateos, Idaira Jael Exposito‐Afonso, Tania Labiano‐Miravalles, Lara Pijuan, Jordi Temprana‐Salvador, Qing Zhao, Xiaoyin “Sara” Jiang |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 8 | 24% |
United States | 4 | 12% |
United Kingdom | 2 | 6% |
Mexico | 1 | 3% |
India | 1 | 3% |
Brazil | 1 | 3% |
Italy | 1 | 3% |
France | 1 | 3% |
Colombia | 1 | 3% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 13 | 39% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 22 | 67% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 15% |
Scientists | 5 | 15% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 4 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Other | 3 | 75% |
Lecturer | 1 | 25% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 50% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 25% |
Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 March 2024.
All research outputs
#2,064,651
of 26,608,834 outputs
Outputs from Cytopathology
#13
of 837 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,812
of 390,610 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cytopathology
#6
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,608,834 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 837 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 390,610 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.