↓ Skip to main content

Surgical interventions for treating distal radial fractures in adults

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
29 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
128 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Surgical interventions for treating distal radial fractures in adults
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2009
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003209.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Helen HG Handoll, Rajan Madhok

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 128 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 2%
China 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Unknown 124 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 24 19%
Student > Bachelor 17 13%
Other 13 10%
Researcher 12 9%
Student > Postgraduate 10 8%
Other 29 23%
Unknown 23 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 70 55%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 3%
Sports and Recreations 4 3%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 2%
Engineering 3 2%
Other 14 11%
Unknown 30 23%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 February 2016.
All research outputs
#7,512,050
of 22,947,506 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,990
of 12,333 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,298
of 110,436 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#42
of 66 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,947,506 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,333 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.6. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 110,436 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 66 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.