↓ Skip to main content

Anaesthesia for treating distal radial fracture in adults

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2002
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
video
1 video uploader

Citations

dimensions_citation
52 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
195 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Anaesthesia for treating distal radial fracture in adults
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2002
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003320
Pubmed ID
Authors

Helen HG Handoll, Rajan Madhok, Chris Dodds

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 195 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 2 1%
China 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 190 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 33 17%
Student > Bachelor 29 15%
Researcher 24 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 9%
Other 16 8%
Other 37 19%
Unknown 38 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 105 54%
Nursing and Health Professions 18 9%
Psychology 7 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 3%
Social Sciences 6 3%
Other 9 5%
Unknown 44 23%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 August 2019.
All research outputs
#4,777,074
of 15,703,613 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,506
of 11,259 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#119,222
of 357,362 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#162
of 217 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,703,613 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,259 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.4. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 357,362 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 217 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.