↓ Skip to main content

Anaesthesia for treating distal radial fracture in adults

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2002
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
video
1 video uploader

Citations

dimensions_citation
51 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
149 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Anaesthesia for treating distal radial fracture in adults
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2002
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003320
Pubmed ID
Authors

Helen HG Handoll, Rajan Madhok, Chris Dodds

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 149 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 2 1%
China 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 144 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 24 16%
Student > Bachelor 21 14%
Researcher 19 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 8%
Other 31 21%
Unknown 27 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 82 55%
Nursing and Health Professions 16 11%
Psychology 7 5%
Social Sciences 6 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 3%
Other 3 2%
Unknown 31 21%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 August 2019.
All research outputs
#4,040,027
of 13,897,020 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,000
of 10,751 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#114,110
of 348,773 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#160
of 218 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,897,020 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,751 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.4. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 348,773 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 218 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.