You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Cardiovascular Effects of Intensive Lifestyle Intervention in Type 2 Diabetes
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
New England Journal of Medicine, June 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1056/nejmoa1212914 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Rena R Wing, Paula Bolin, Frederick L Brancati, George A Bray, Jeanne M Clark, Mace Coday, Richard S Crow, Jeffrey M Curtis, Caitlin M Egan, Mark A Espeland, Mary Evans, John P Foreyt, Siran Ghazarian, Edward W Gregg, Barbara Harrison, Helen P Hazuda, James O Hill, Edward S Horton, Van S Hubbard, John M Jakicic, Robert W Jeffery, Karen C Johnson, Steven E Kahn, Abbas E Kitabchi, William C Knowler, Cora E Lewis, Barbara J Maschak-Carey, Maria G Montez, Anne Murillo, David M Nathan, Jennifer Patricio, Anne Peters, Xavier Pi-Sunyer, Henry Pownall, David Reboussin, Judith G Regensteiner, Amy D Rickman, Donna H Ryan, Monika Safford, Thomas A Wadden, Lynne E Wagenknecht, Delia S West, David F Williamson, Susan Z Yanovski |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 703 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 106 | 15% |
| United Kingdom | 44 | 6% |
| Canada | 29 | 4% |
| Mexico | 27 | 4% |
| Australia | 26 | 4% |
| Spain | 23 | 3% |
| France | 18 | 3% |
| Japan | 17 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 13 | 2% |
| Other | 120 | 17% |
| Unknown | 280 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 493 | 70% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 110 | 16% |
| Scientists | 91 | 13% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 9 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,153 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 12 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 8 | <1% |
| Germany | 4 | <1% |
| Spain | 4 | <1% |
| Australia | 4 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 2 | <1% |
| Italy | 2 | <1% |
| Denmark | 2 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 17 | 1% |
| Unknown | 1096 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 209 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 203 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 180 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 155 | 13% |
| Other | 112 | 10% |
| Other | 386 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 683 | 59% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 127 | 11% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 89 | 8% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 55 | 5% |
| Sports and Recreations | 46 | 4% |
| Other | 176 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1477. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 April 2024.
All research outputs
#8,273
of 25,801,916 outputs
Outputs from New England Journal of Medicine
#424
of 32,692 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19
of 210,106 outputs
Outputs of similar age from New England Journal of Medicine
#2
of 320 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,801,916 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 32,692 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 122.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 210,106 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 320 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.