↓ Skip to main content

Soil organic carbon stocks in native forest of Argentina: a useful surrogate for mitigation and conservation planning under climate variability

Overview of attention for article published in Ecological Processes, January 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#6 of 188)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
84 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
38 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Soil organic carbon stocks in native forest of Argentina: a useful surrogate for mitigation and conservation planning under climate variability
Published in
Ecological Processes, January 2024
DOI 10.1186/s13717-023-00474-5
Authors

Pablo L. Peri, Juan Gaitán, Matías Mastrangelo, Marcelo Nosetto, Pablo E. Villagra, Ezequiel Balducci, Martín Pinazo, Roxana P. Eclesia, Alejandra Von Wallis, Sebastián Villarino, Francisco Alaggia, Marina González Polo, Silvina Manrique, Pablo A. Meglioli, Julián Rodríguez-Souilla, Martín Mónaco, Jimena E. Chaves, Ariel Medina, Ignacio Gasparri, Eugenio Alvarez Arnesi, María Paula Barral, Axel von Müller, Norberto M. Pahr, Josefina Uribe Echevarria, Pedro Fernández, Marina Morsucci, Dardo López, Juan Manuel Cellini, Leandro Alvarez, Ignacio Barberis, Hernán Colomb, Ludmila La Manna, Sebastián Barbaro, Cecilia Blundo, Ximena Sirimarco, Laura Cavallero, Gualberto Zalazar, Guillermo Martínez Pastur

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 84 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 38 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 4 11%
Researcher 4 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 11%
Student > Master 3 8%
Other 3 8%
Other 5 13%
Unknown 15 39%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 18%
Environmental Science 5 13%
Unspecified 4 11%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 8%
Engineering 2 5%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 14 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 62. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 January 2024.
All research outputs
#742,551
of 26,742,580 outputs
Outputs from Ecological Processes
#6
of 188 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,596
of 393,108 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecological Processes
#1
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,742,580 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 188 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 393,108 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them