↓ Skip to main content

Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) for treating lateral elbow pain in adults

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
34 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
208 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) for treating lateral elbow pain in adults
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003686.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Porjai Pattanittum, Tari Turner, Sally Green, Rachelle Buchbinder

Abstract

Lateral elbow pain, or tennis elbow, is a common condition that causes pain in the elbow and forearm. Although self-limiting, it can be associated with significant disability and often results in work absence. It is often treated with topical and oral non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). This is an update of a review first published in 2002 (search date October 11, 2012).

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 208 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 3 1%
Israel 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Greece 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 197 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 51 25%
Student > Bachelor 32 15%
Other 24 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 21 10%
Researcher 19 9%
Other 46 22%
Unknown 15 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 103 50%
Nursing and Health Professions 33 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 5%
Psychology 7 3%
Sports and Recreations 6 3%
Other 28 13%
Unknown 21 10%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 January 2019.
All research outputs
#825,756
of 14,098,389 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,555
of 10,846 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,251
of 153,879 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#22
of 141 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,098,389 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,846 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 153,879 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 141 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.