↓ Skip to main content
Embed badge What is this page?

Article

Overview of attention for article published in Chiropractic & Osteopathy, January 2005
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (53rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
28 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
80 Mendeley

What is this page?

Summary Twitter Facebook Dimensions citations
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Published in
Chiropractic & Osteopathy, January 2005
DOI 10.1186/1746-1340-13-4
Pubmed ID
15967047
Authors

Wayne T Hoskins, Henry P Pollard

Abstract

Hamstring injuries are the most prevalent injury in Australian Rules football. There is a lack of evidence based literature on the treatment, prevention and management of hamstring injuries, although it is agreed that the etiology is complicated and multi-factorial. We present two cases of hamstring injury that had full resolution after spinal manipulation and correction of lumbar-pelvic biomechanics. There was no recurrence through preventative treatment over a twelve and sixteen week period. The use of spinal manipulation for treatment or prevention of hamstring injury has not been documented in sports medicine literature and should be further investigated in prospective randomized controlled trials.

View on publisher site

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 80 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 1%
Australia 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 76 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 18 23%
Student > Master 15 19%
Unspecified 10 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 10%
Student > Postgraduate 6 8%
Other 23 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 37 46%
Sports and Recreations 24 30%
Unspecified 10 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 6%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 1%
Other 3 4%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 August 2019.
All research outputs
#7,576,041
of 13,457,898 outputs
Outputs from Chiropractic & Osteopathy
#51
of 77 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#68,491
of 152,750 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Chiropractic & Osteopathy
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,457,898 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 77 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 152,750 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them

This page is provided by Altmetric.