Title |
A protocol for evaluating progressive levels of simulation fidelity in the development of technical skills, integrated performance and woman centred clinical assessment skills in undergraduate midwifery students
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Medical Education, May 2013
|
DOI | 10.1186/1472-6920-13-72 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Susannah Brady, Fiona Bogossian, Kristen Gibbons, Andrew Wells, Pauline Lyon, Donna Bonney, Melanie Barlow, Anne Jackson |
Abstract |
Simulation as a pedagogical approach has been used in health professional education to address the need to safely develop effective clinical skills prior to undertaking clinical practice. However, evidence for the use of simulation in midwifery is largely anecdotal, and research evaluating the effectiveness of different levels of simulation fidelity are lacking.Woman centred care is a core premise of the midwifery profession and describes the behaviours of an individual midwife who demonstrates safe and effective care of the individual woman. Woman centred care occurs when the midwife modifies the care to ensure the needs of each individual woman are respected and addressed. However, a review of the literature demonstrates an absence of a valid and reliable tool to measure the development of woman centred care behaviours. This study aims to determine which level of fidelity in simulated learning experiences provides the most effective learning outcomes in the development of woman centred clinical assessment behaviors and skills in student midwives. |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
Chile | 1 | <1% |
Canada | 1 | <1% |
Spain | 1 | <1% |
United States | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 129 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 29 | 22% |
Student > Bachelor | 15 | 11% |
Lecturer | 12 | 9% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 9% |
Researcher | 8 | 6% |
Other | 33 | 25% |
Unknown | 25 | 19% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 38 | 28% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 33 | 25% |
Psychology | 14 | 10% |
Social Sciences | 7 | 5% |
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 3 | 2% |
Other | 13 | 10% |
Unknown | 26 | 19% |