↓ Skip to main content

Pitfalls in Thyroid Fine-Needle Aspiration Cytopathology: An Approach to Atypical Findings

Overview of attention for article published in Acta Cytologica, December 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#4 of 578)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
38 X users

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Pitfalls in Thyroid Fine-Needle Aspiration Cytopathology: An Approach to Atypical Findings
Published in
Acta Cytologica, December 2023
DOI 10.1159/000535907
Pubmed ID
Authors

C. Christofer Juhlin, Zubair W. Baloch

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 38 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 August 2024.
All research outputs
#1,796,482
of 26,486,749 outputs
Outputs from Acta Cytologica
#4
of 578 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,402
of 386,829 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Acta Cytologica
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,486,749 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 578 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 386,829 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them