You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A review of decision support, risk communication and patient information tools for thrombolytic treatment in acute stroke: lessons for tool developers
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Health Services Research, June 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1472-6963-13-225 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Darren Flynn, Gary A Ford, Lynne Stobbart, Helen Rodgers, Madeleine J Murtagh, Richard G Thomson |
| Abstract |
Tools to support clinical or patient decision-making in the treatment/management of a health condition are used in a range of clinical settings for numerous preference-sensitive healthcare decisions. Their impact in clinical practice is largely dependent on their quality across a range of domains. We critically analysed currently available tools to support decision making or patient understanding in the treatment of acute ischaemic stroke with intravenous thrombolysis, as an exemplar to provide clinicians/researchers with practical guidance on development, evaluation and implementation of such tools for other preference-sensitive treatment options/decisions in different clinical contexts. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 131 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 129 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 20 | 15% |
| Researcher | 19 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 11% |
| Librarian | 12 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 7% |
| Other | 29 | 22% |
| Unknown | 28 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 37 | 28% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 15 | 11% |
| Social Sciences | 11 | 8% |
| Psychology | 10 | 8% |
| Computer Science | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 20 | 15% |
| Unknown | 34 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 June 2015.
All research outputs
#7,873,048
of 23,868,111 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#3,891
of 7,941 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#67,105
of 199,228 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#53
of 118 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,868,111 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,941 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 199,228 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 118 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.