↓ Skip to main content

Classificação de risco de transmissão de doenças imunopreveníveis a partir de indicadores de coberturas vacinais nos municípios brasileiros

Overview of attention for article published in Epidemiologia e Serviços de Saúde, October 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
44 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Classificação de risco de transmissão de doenças imunopreveníveis a partir de indicadores de coberturas vacinais nos municípios brasileiros
Published in
Epidemiologia e Serviços de Saúde, October 2016
DOI 10.5123/s1679-49742016000400008
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rui Moreira Braz, Carla Magda Allan S. Domingues, Antônia Maria da Silva Teixeira, Expedito José de Albuquerque Luna, Rui Moreira Braz, Carla Magda Allan S. Domingues, Antônia Maria da Silva Teixeira, Expedito José de Albuquerque Luna

Abstract

to describe the transmission risk classification of vaccine-preventable diseases in Brazilian municipalities. this was a descriptive epidemiologic study using 2014 data of the Brazilian National Immunization Program Information System; the vaccine coverage indicators were used to classify the transmission risk of vaccine-preventable diseases in the municipalities. of the 5,570 Brazilian municipalities, 12.0% were classified as very low risk, 29.6% as low risk, 2.2% as medium risk, 54.3% as high risk and 1.8% as very high risk. the vaccination coverage surveillance allowed to identify most of the municipalities in high risk situation and the minority of children living in municipalities with appropriate coverage; the vaccination coverage surveillance using indicators of the Brazilian National Health System (SUS) is a new tool for identifying priority areas where the actions can be more successful for health managers and improve the quality and the success of the immunizations program.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 1 2%
Unknown 43 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 10 23%
Student > Master 5 11%
Student > Postgraduate 4 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 7%
Professor 2 5%
Other 6 14%
Unknown 14 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 25%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 18%
Social Sciences 3 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 5%
Computer Science 1 2%
Other 4 9%
Unknown 15 34%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 January 2017.
All research outputs
#9,185,906
of 15,650,802 outputs
Outputs from Epidemiologia e Serviços de Saúde
#54
of 252 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#173,706
of 356,864 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Epidemiologia e Serviços de Saúde
#14
of 57 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,650,802 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 252 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 356,864 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 57 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.