You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
High pretreatment disease burden as a risk factor for infectious complications following CD19 chimeric antigen receptor T‐cell therapy for large B‐cell lymphoma
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
HemaSphere, January 2024
|
| DOI | 10.1002/hem3.29 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Maeve A. O'Reilly, Lorna Neill, Simon M. Collin, Neil Stone, Deborah Springell, Jeremy Mensah, Kathleen P. L. Cheok, Katarzyna Jalowiec, Reuben Benjamin, Andrea Kuhnl, Claire Roddie, Robin Sanderson |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 85 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 18 | 21% |
| Spain | 7 | 8% |
| India | 3 | 4% |
| Chile | 2 | 2% |
| United States | 2 | 2% |
| Brazil | 1 | 1% |
| Belgium | 1 | 1% |
| Russia | 1 | 1% |
| Saudi Arabia | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 4 | 5% |
| Unknown | 45 | 53% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 61 | 72% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 11 | 13% |
| Scientists | 11 | 13% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 1 | 50% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 1 | 50% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 54. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 February 2024.
All research outputs
#805,168
of 25,887,951 outputs
Outputs from HemaSphere
#12
of 907 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,805
of 356,703 outputs
Outputs of similar age from HemaSphere
#1
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,887,951 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 907 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 356,703 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.