| Title |
Prevalence and risk of traumatic gingival recession following elective lip piercing
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Dental Traumatology, January 2006
|
| DOI | 10.1111/j.1600-9657.2006.00332.x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jonathan W. Leichter, Brian D. Monteith |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 76 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Portugal | 1 | 1% |
| Germany | 1 | 1% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 1% |
| Iran, Islamic Republic of | 1 | 1% |
| Oman | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 71 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 16 | 21% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 9 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 9% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 7 | 9% |
| Researcher | 6 | 8% |
| Other | 18 | 24% |
| Unknown | 13 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 46 | 61% |
| Psychology | 4 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 4% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 3 | 4% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 5 | 7% |
| Unknown | 14 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 January 2024.
All research outputs
#8,534,528
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Dental Traumatology
#140
of 719 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,843
of 172,867 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Dental Traumatology
#5
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 719 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 172,867 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.