You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Is fruit and vegetable intake associated with asthma or chronic rhino‐sinusitis in European adults? Results from the Global Allergy and Asthma Network of Excellence (GA2 LEN) Survey
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical and Translational Allergy, January 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13601-016-0140-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Vanessa Garcia-Larsen, Rhonda Arthur, James F. Potts, Peter H. Howarth, Matti Ahlström, Tari Haahtela, Carlos Loureiro, Ana Todo Bom, Grzegorz Brożek, Joanna Makowska, Marek L. Kowalski, Trine Thilsing, Thomas Keil, Paolo M. Matricardi, Kjell Torén, Thibaut van Zele, Claus Bachert, Barbara Rymarczyk, Christer Janson, Bertil Forsberg, Ewa Niżankowska-Mogilnicka, Peter G. J. Burney |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 2 | 22% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 11% |
| Belgium | 1 | 11% |
| Finland | 1 | 11% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 3 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 78% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 22% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Finland | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 36 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 5 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 11% |
| Researcher | 3 | 8% |
| Professor | 3 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 7 | 19% |
| Unknown | 13 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 32% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 8% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 8% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 5% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 5% |
| Unknown | 14 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 January 2018.
All research outputs
#6,587,541
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Clinical and Translational Allergy
#353
of 765 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#110,545
of 428,532 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical and Translational Allergy
#7
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 765 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 428,532 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.