↓ Skip to main content

Oxytocin versus no treatment or delayed treatment for slow progress in the first stage of spontaneous labour

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
11 tweeters
facebook
6 Facebook pages
q&a
1 Q&A thread

Citations

dimensions_citation
67 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
83 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Oxytocin versus no treatment or delayed treatment for slow progress in the first stage of spontaneous labour
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007123.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

George J Bugg, Farah Siddiqui, Jim G Thornton

Abstract

Slow progress in the first stage of spontaneous labour is associated with an increased caesarean section rate and fetal and maternal morbidity. Oxytocin has long been advocated as a treatment for slow progress in labour but it is unclear to what extent it improves the outcomes for that labour and whether it actually reduces the caesarean section rate or maternal and fetal morbidity. This review will address the use of oxytocin and whether it improves the outcomes for women who are progressing slowly in labour compared to situations where it is not used or where its administration is delayed.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 83 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 2 2%
Unknown 81 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 12 14%
Student > Bachelor 12 14%
Researcher 9 11%
Other 8 10%
Student > Postgraduate 7 8%
Other 22 27%
Unknown 13 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 29 35%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 6%
Psychology 5 6%
Social Sciences 4 5%
Other 6 7%
Unknown 24 29%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 July 2018.
All research outputs
#781,743
of 14,353,628 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,346
of 10,946 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,499
of 154,257 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#20
of 146 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,353,628 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,946 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 154,257 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 146 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.