↓ Skip to main content

Definition of a core set of quality indicators for the assessment of HIV/AIDS clinical care: a systematic review

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Health Services Research, June 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
80 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Definition of a core set of quality indicators for the assessment of HIV/AIDS clinical care: a systematic review
Published in
BMC Health Services Research, June 2013
DOI 10.1186/1472-6963-13-236
Pubmed ID
Authors

Emanuel Catumbela, Victor Certal, Alberto Freitas, Carlos Costa, António Sarmento, Altamiro da Costa Pereira

Abstract

Several organizations and individual authors have been proposing quality indicators for the assessment of clinical care in HIV/AIDS patients. Nevertheless, the definition of a consensual core set of indicators remains controversial and its practical use is largely limited. This study aims not only to identify and characterize these indicators through a systematic literature review but also to propose a parsimonious model based on those most used.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 80 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 1%
Mexico 1 1%
Unknown 78 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 14 18%
Student > Master 14 18%
Student > Bachelor 11 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 9%
Student > Postgraduate 7 9%
Other 15 19%
Unknown 12 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 31 39%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 10%
Social Sciences 7 9%
Engineering 5 6%
Psychology 5 6%
Other 9 11%
Unknown 15 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 July 2013.
All research outputs
#14,214,574
of 24,479,790 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#4,808
of 8,272 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#104,944
of 199,807 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#65
of 119 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,479,790 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,272 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 199,807 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 119 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.