↓ Skip to main content

Nuclear mass table in deformed relativistic Hartree–Bogoliubov theory in continuum, II: Even- Z nuclei

Overview of attention for article published in Atomic Data & Nuclear Data Tables, July 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Nuclear mass table in deformed relativistic Hartree–Bogoliubov theory in continuum, II: Even- Z nuclei
Published in
Atomic Data & Nuclear Data Tables, July 2024
DOI 10.1016/j.adt.2024.101661
Authors

Peng Guo, Xiaojie Cao, Kangmin Chen, Zhihui Chen, Myung-Ki Cheoun, Yong-Beom Choi, Pak Chung Lam, Wenmin Deng, Jianmin Dong, Pengxiang Du, Xiaokai Du, Kangda Duan, Xiaohua Fan, Wei Gao, Lisheng Geng, Eunja Ha, Xiao-Tao He, Jinniu Hu, Jingke Huang, Kun Huang, Yanan Huang, Zidan Huang, Kim Da Hyung, Hoi Yat Chan, Xiaofei Jiang, Seonghyun Kim, Youngman Kim, Chang-Hwan Lee, Jenny Lee, Jian Li, Minglong Li, Zhipan Li, Zhengzheng Li, Zhanjiang Lian, Haozhao Liang, Lang Liu, Xiao Lu, Zhi-Rui Liu, Jie Meng, Ziyan Meng, Myeong-Hwan Mun, Yifei Niu, Zhongming Niu, Cong Pan, Jing Peng, Xiaoying Qu, Panagiota Papakonstantinou, Tianshuai Shang, Xinle Shang, Caiwan Shen, Guofang Shen, Tingting Sun, Xiang-Xiang Sun, Sibo Wang, Tianyu Wang, Yiran Wang, Yuanyuan Wang, Jiawei Wu, Liang Wu, Xinhui Wu, Xuewei Xia, Huihui Xie, Jiangming Yao, Kwan Yau Ip, To Chung Yiu, Jianghan Yu, Yangyang Yu, Kaiyuan Zhang, Shijie Zhang, Shuangquan Zhang, Wei Zhang, Xiaoyan Zhang, Yanxin Zhang, Ying Zhang, Yingxun Zhang, Zhenhua Zhang, Qiang Zhao, Yingchun Zhao, Ruyou Zheng, Chang Zhou, Shan-Gui Zhou, Lianjian Zou, DRHBc Mass Table Collaboration

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 1 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 1 100%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 June 2024.
All research outputs
#20,949,761
of 26,617,918 outputs
Outputs from Atomic Data & Nuclear Data Tables
#96
of 145 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#192,386
of 308,097 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Atomic Data & Nuclear Data Tables
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,617,918 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 145 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 308,097 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them