↓ Skip to main content
What is this page? Embed badge

Discrepancies between the modeled and proxy-reconstructed response to volcanic forcing over the past millennium: Implications and possible mechanisms

Overview of attention for article published in JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH: ATMOSPHERES, July 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
8 tweeters
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
45 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
Summary News Blogs Twitter Facebook Dimensions citations
Title
Discrepancies between the modeled and proxy-reconstructed response to volcanic forcing over the past millennium: Implications and possible mechanisms
Published in
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH: ATMOSPHERES, July 2013
DOI 10.1002/jgrd.50609
Authors

Michael E. Mann, Scott Rutherford, Andrew Schurer, Simon F.B. Tett, Jose D. Fuentes

View on publisher site

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 2 4%
Jamaica 1 2%
Germany 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Unknown 40 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 15 33%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 22%
Student > Bachelor 4 9%
Lecturer 2 4%
Professor 2 4%
Other 6 13%
Unknown 6 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 22 49%
Environmental Science 8 18%
Chemistry 2 4%
Physics and Astronomy 2 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Other 3 7%
Unknown 7 16%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 33. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 October 2017.
All research outputs
#1,027,287
of 22,713,403 outputs
Outputs from JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH: ATMOSPHERES
#270
of 4,373 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,405
of 197,944 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH: ATMOSPHERES
#6
of 107 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,713,403 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,373 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 197,944 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 107 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.

This page is provided by Altmetric.