↓ Skip to main content

Discrepancies between the modeled and proxy‐reconstructed response to volcanic forcing over the past millennium: Implications and possible mechanisms

Overview of attention for article published in JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH: ATMOSPHERES, July 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
8 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
46 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
Title
Discrepancies between the modeled and proxy‐reconstructed response to volcanic forcing over the past millennium: Implications and possible mechanisms
Published in
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH: ATMOSPHERES, July 2013
DOI 10.1002/jgrd.50609
Authors

Michael E. Mann, Scott Rutherford, Andrew Schurer, Simon F.B. Tett, Jose D. Fuentes

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 2 4%
Jamaica 1 2%
Germany 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Unknown 41 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 16 35%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 22%
Student > Bachelor 4 9%
Lecturer 2 4%
Professor 2 4%
Other 5 11%
Unknown 7 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 23 50%
Environmental Science 8 17%
Chemistry 2 4%
Physics and Astronomy 2 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 8 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 33. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 October 2017.
All research outputs
#1,212,304
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH: ATMOSPHERES
#314
of 5,300 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,102
of 209,580 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH: ATMOSPHERES
#7
of 108 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,300 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 209,580 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 108 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.