↓ Skip to main content

Rationing by Inconvenience: How Insurance Denials Induce Administrative Burdens

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law, August 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
41 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Rationing by Inconvenience: How Insurance Denials Induce Administrative Burdens
Published in
Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law, August 2024
DOI 10.1215/03616878-11186111
Pubmed ID
Authors

Miranda Yaver

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 41 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 27. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 September 2024.
All research outputs
#1,546,140
of 26,724,005 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law
#116
of 1,130 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,821
of 291,582 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,724,005 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,130 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 291,582 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them