The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 41 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Rationing by Inconvenience: How Insurance Denials Induce Administrative Burdens
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law, August 2024
|
DOI | 10.1215/03616878-11186111 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Miranda Yaver |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 28 | 68% |
Korea, Republic of | 1 | 2% |
Canada | 1 | 2% |
Curaçao | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 10 | 24% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 23 | 56% |
Members of the public | 17 | 41% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 2% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 27. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 September 2024.
All research outputs
#1,546,140
of 26,724,005 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law
#116
of 1,130 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,821
of 291,582 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,724,005 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,130 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 291,582 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them