You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Long-term follow-up evaluation of revisional gastric bypass after failed adjustable gastric banding
|
---|---|
Published in |
Surgical Endoscopy, June 2013
|
DOI | 10.1007/s00464-013-3047-8 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Alexander Perathoner, Matthias Zitt, Monika Lanthaler, Johann Pratschke, Matthias Biebl, Reinhard Mittermair |
Abstract |
Disappointing long-term results, frequent band failure, and high rates of band-related complications increasingly necessitate revisional surgery after adjustable gastric banding. Laparoscopic conversion to gastric bypass has been recommended as the procedure of choice. This single-center retrospective study aimed to evaluate the long-term results of revisional gastric bypass after failed adjustable gastric banding. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Kuwait | 1 | 33% |
Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Portugal | 1 | 3% |
Austria | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 37 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 6 | 15% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 13% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 13% |
Researcher | 4 | 10% |
Other | 3 | 8% |
Other | 7 | 18% |
Unknown | 9 | 23% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 22 | 56% |
Psychology | 2 | 5% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 3% |
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 3% |
Chemistry | 1 | 3% |
Other | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 11 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 July 2013.
All research outputs
#13,690,328
of 22,713,403 outputs
Outputs from Surgical Endoscopy
#2,990
of 6,006 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#106,359
of 196,330 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Surgical Endoscopy
#21
of 63 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,713,403 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,006 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 196,330 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 63 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.