↓ Skip to main content

Interventions for cutaneous Bowen's disease

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 tweeter
facebook
3 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
41 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
107 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Interventions for cutaneous Bowen's disease
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007281.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Fiona J Bath-Hextall, Rubeta N Matin, David Wilkinson, Jo Leonardi-Bee

Abstract

Bowen's disease is the clinical term for in situ squamous cell carcinoma of the skin. Cutaneous lesions present as largely asymptomatic, well-defined, scaly erythematous patches on sun-exposed skin. In general, people with Bowen's disease have an excellent prognosis because the disease is typically slow-growing and responds favourably to treatment. Lesions are persistent and can be progressive, with a small potential (estimated to be 3%) to develop into invasive squamous cell carcinoma. The relative effectiveness of the available treatments is not known for Bowen's disease, and this review attempts to address which is the most effective intervention, with the least side-effects, for cutaneous Bowen's disease.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 107 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
Unknown 105 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 22 21%
Researcher 18 17%
Student > Bachelor 17 16%
Unspecified 11 10%
Student > Postgraduate 8 7%
Other 31 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 58 54%
Unspecified 17 16%
Psychology 11 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 6%
Other 8 7%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 August 2019.
All research outputs
#1,361,758
of 13,521,117 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,885
of 10,624 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,003
of 152,462 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#41
of 147 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,521,117 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,624 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 152,462 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 147 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.