↓ Skip to main content

Interventions for cutaneous Bowen's disease

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
2 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages
wikipedia
6 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
86 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
266 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Interventions for cutaneous Bowen's disease
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007281.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Fiona J Bath‐Hextall, Rubeta N Matin, David Wilkinson, Jo Leonardi‐Bee

Abstract

Bowen's disease is the clinical term for in situ squamous cell carcinoma of the skin. Cutaneous lesions present as largely asymptomatic, well-defined, scaly erythematous patches on sun-exposed skin. In general, people with Bowen's disease have an excellent prognosis because the disease is typically slow-growing and responds favourably to treatment. Lesions are persistent and can be progressive, with a small potential (estimated to be 3%) to develop into invasive squamous cell carcinoma. The relative effectiveness of the available treatments is not known for Bowen's disease, and this review attempts to address which is the most effective intervention, with the least side-effects, for cutaneous Bowen's disease.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 266 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
Unknown 264 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 37 14%
Student > Bachelor 34 13%
Researcher 27 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 8%
Other 20 8%
Other 52 20%
Unknown 74 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 105 39%
Nursing and Health Professions 27 10%
Psychology 14 5%
Unspecified 8 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 3%
Other 26 10%
Unknown 79 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 November 2023.
All research outputs
#2,996,360
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,622
of 11,842 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,921
of 209,367 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#132
of 291 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,842 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 209,367 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 291 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.