↓ Skip to main content

Chinese medicinal herbs for cholelithiasis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (51st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
66 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Chinese medicinal herbs for cholelithiasis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004547.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tao Gan, Jun Chen, Shuli J Jin, Yiping Wang

Abstract

Cholelithiasis is a common disease of the biliary tract. Chinese medicinal herbs are being used widely as an alternative treatment in people with cholelithiasis, but their beneficial or harmful effects have not been assessed systematically.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 66 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
South Africa 1 2%
Unknown 65 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 10 15%
Researcher 8 12%
Student > Postgraduate 6 9%
Student > Bachelor 6 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 9%
Other 18 27%
Unknown 12 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 28 42%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 15%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 3%
Other 6 9%
Unknown 14 21%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 June 2017.
All research outputs
#7,230,420
of 12,527,219 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,448
of 8,923 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#68,468
of 149,120 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#102
of 145 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,527,219 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,923 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.2. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 149,120 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 145 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.