↓ Skip to main content

Getting to grips with the beast: the potential of multi-method operational research approaches

Overview of attention for article published in BMJ Quality & Safety, January 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
22 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
5 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Getting to grips with the beast: the potential of multi-method operational research approaches
Published in
BMJ Quality & Safety, January 2017
DOI 10.1136/bmjqs-2017-006484
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jenni Burt

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 22 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 5 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 2 40%
Student > Master 1 20%
Student > Postgraduate 1 20%
Researcher 1 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 3 60%
Decision Sciences 1 20%
Environmental Science 1 20%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 July 2017.
All research outputs
#920,134
of 11,500,624 outputs
Outputs from BMJ Quality & Safety
#564
of 1,217 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,133
of 322,267 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMJ Quality & Safety
#14
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 11,500,624 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,217 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 31.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 322,267 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.