You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The possibility of predicting learning performance using features of note taking activities and instructions in a blended learning environment
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, January 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s41239-017-0048-z |
| Authors |
Minoru Nakayama, Kouichi Mutsuura, Hiroh Yamamoto |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 3 | 25% |
| Ecuador | 2 | 17% |
| Colombia | 1 | 8% |
| Germany | 1 | 8% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 8% |
| Canada | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 3 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 58% |
| Scientists | 4 | 33% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 63 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 63 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 16% |
| Lecturer | 7 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 6% |
| Researcher | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 11 | 17% |
| Unknown | 20 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 14 | 22% |
| Computer Science | 5 | 8% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 3 | 5% |
| Psychology | 3 | 5% |
| Arts and Humanities | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 9 | 14% |
| Unknown | 26 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 September 2020.
All research outputs
#4,048,380
of 24,456,171 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education
#262
of 411 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#78,249
of 428,714 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education
#7
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,456,171 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 411 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.7. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 428,714 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.