The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Paul Graupe, Arthur Goldschmidt and the dispute over an Adriaen van Ostade painting in wartime France
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of the History of Collections, February 2024
|
DOI | 10.1093/jhc/fhad048 |
Authors |
Victoria S Reed |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 3 | 25% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 8% |
Netherlands | 1 | 8% |
France | 1 | 8% |
Unknown | 6 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 11 | 92% |
Scientists | 1 | 8% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 March 2024.
All research outputs
#3,898,435
of 26,613,602 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the History of Collections
#19
of 245 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#60,038
of 360,746 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the History of Collections
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,613,602 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 245 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 360,746 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them