↓ Skip to main content

Early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for people with acute cholecystitis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
googleplus
1 Google+ user
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
172 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
229 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for people with acute cholecystitis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd005440.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kurinchi Selvan Gurusamy, Christopher Davidson, Christian Gluud, Brian R Davidson

Abstract

Gallstones are present in about 10% to 15% of the adult western population. Between 1% and 4% of these adults become symptomatic in a year (the majority due to biliary colic but a significant proportion due to acute cholecystitis). Laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis is mainly performed after the acute cholecystitis episode settles because of the fear of higher morbidity and of need for conversion from laparoscopic to open cholecystectomy. However, delaying surgery exposes the people to gallstone-related complications.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 229 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 227 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 46 20%
Student > Bachelor 38 17%
Student > Postgraduate 25 11%
Other 25 11%
Researcher 24 10%
Other 44 19%
Unknown 27 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 150 66%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 3%
Psychology 4 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 1%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 3 1%
Other 19 8%
Unknown 42 18%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 February 2020.
All research outputs
#2,995,356
of 15,679,642 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,741
of 11,246 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,804
of 157,950 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#60
of 155 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,679,642 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,246 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.3. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 157,950 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 155 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.