↓ Skip to main content

Uterine massage for preventing postpartum haemorrhage

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
wikipedia
5 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
74 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
421 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Uterine massage for preventing postpartum haemorrhage
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006431.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

G Justus Hofmeyr, Hany Abdel‐Aleem, Mahmoud A Abdel‐Aleem

Abstract

Postpartum haemorrhage (PPH) (bleeding from the genital tract after childbirth) is a major cause of maternal mortality and disability, particularly in under-resourced areas. In these settings, uterotonics are often not accessible. There is a need for simple, inexpensive techniques which can be applied in low-resourced settings to prevent and treat PPH. Uterine massage is recommended as part of the routine active management of the third stage of labour. However, it is not known whether it is effective. If shown to be effective, uterine massage would represent a simple intervention with the potential to have a major effect on PPH and maternal mortality in under-resourced settings.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 421 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Unknown 416 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 62 15%
Student > Master 44 10%
Researcher 31 7%
Student > Postgraduate 28 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 6%
Other 75 18%
Unknown 157 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 119 28%
Nursing and Health Professions 77 18%
Social Sciences 15 4%
Unspecified 8 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 1%
Other 30 7%
Unknown 167 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 June 2023.
All research outputs
#6,523,781
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,793
of 11,842 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#51,295
of 206,924 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#190
of 302 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,842 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.9. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 206,924 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 302 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.