You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Long-term outcomes from the English national comparative audit of surgery for nasal polyposis and chronic rhinosinusitis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
The Laryngoscope, September 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1002/lary.20653 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Claire Hopkins, Robert Slack, Valerie Lund, Peter Brown, Lynn Copley, John Browne |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 130 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Singapore | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 128 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 20 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 12% |
| Other | 13 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 10 | 8% |
| Other | 28 | 22% |
| Unknown | 33 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 64 | 49% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 4% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 4 | 3% |
| Chemistry | 3 | 2% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 11 | 8% |
| Unknown | 41 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 August 2022.
All research outputs
#3,320,137
of 23,053,169 outputs
Outputs from The Laryngoscope
#393
of 6,304 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,660
of 93,678 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Laryngoscope
#2
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,053,169 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,304 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 93,678 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.