↓ Skip to main content
What is this page? Embed badge

Long-term outcomes from the English national comparative audit of surgery for nasal polyposis and chronic rhinosinusitis

Overview of attention for article published in The Laryngoscope, September 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
patent
1 patent
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
197 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
138 Mendeley
Summary Policy documents Patents Wikipedia Dimensions citations
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Long-term outcomes from the English national comparative audit of surgery for nasal polyposis and chronic rhinosinusitis
Published in
The Laryngoscope, September 2009
DOI 10.1002/lary.20653
Pubmed ID
19780032
Authors

Claire Hopkins, Robert Slack, Valerie Lund, Peter Brown, Lynn Copley, John Browne

View on publisher site

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 138 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Singapore 1 <1%
Unknown 136 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 15%
Researcher 20 14%
Other 13 9%
Student > Master 11 8%
Student > Postgraduate 10 7%
Other 35 25%
Unknown 28 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 64 46%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 8%
Unspecified 8 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 3%
Chemistry 3 2%
Other 12 9%
Unknown 36 26%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 August 2022.
All research outputs
#3,320,137
of 23,053,169 outputs
Outputs from The Laryngoscope
#393
of 6,304 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,660
of 93,678 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Laryngoscope
#2
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,053,169 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,304 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 93,678 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.

This page is provided by Altmetric.