The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Research on the influencing factors and the differences between the initial trust and continuous trust of online health community users
|
---|---|
Published in |
Neural Computing and Applications, March 2024
|
DOI | 10.1007/s00521-024-09593-2 |
Authors |
Zongrun Wang, Lin Liang, Xin Liu, Minglong Liao |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 6 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unspecified | 1 | 17% |
Professor | 1 | 17% |
Student > Master | 1 | 17% |
Unknown | 3 | 50% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unspecified | 1 | 17% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 17% |
Computer Science | 1 | 17% |
Unknown | 3 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 March 2024.
All research outputs
#4,853,823
of 25,440,205 outputs
Outputs from Neural Computing and Applications
#88
of 2,574 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,499
of 157,001 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neural Computing and Applications
#1
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,440,205 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,574 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 157,001 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them