↓ Skip to main content

Metabolomics: From Fundamentals to Clinical Applications

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 2: Collection and Preparation of Clinical Samples for Metabolomics
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
50 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
77 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Collection and Preparation of Clinical Samples for Metabolomics
Chapter number 2
Book title
Metabolomics: From Fundamentals to Clinical Applications
Published in
Advances in experimental medicine and biology, January 2017
DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-47656-8_2
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-3-31-947655-1, 978-3-31-947656-8
Authors

Andrew J. Chetwynd, Warwick B. Dunn, Giovanny Rodriguez-Blanco, Chetwynd, Andrew J., Dunn, Warwick B., Rodriguez-Blanco, Giovanny

Editors

Alessandra Sussulini

Abstract

A wide range of biofluids (urine, serum, plasma, saliva, etc.) as well as cellular and tissue samples can be collected and investigated in clinical metabolomic studies. The choice of sample is dependent on the clinical question being investigated with biofluids typically studied to identify biomarkers, whereas tissues and primary/immortalised cells are typically studied to investigate mechanisms associated with pathophysiological processes. Methods applied to collect samples, quench metabolism and extract samples differ between sample types from simple collect, dilute and analyse methods for urine to complex washing, quenching and biphasic extraction methods for tissues. The range of sample collection and extraction methods are discussed with sample-specific considerations highlighted. Finally, methods for imaging of cells and tissues and for in vivo metabolomic analysis will also be introduced.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 77 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 77 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 19%
Researcher 14 18%
Student > Master 8 10%
Student > Bachelor 6 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 6%
Other 6 8%
Unknown 23 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 15 19%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 3%
Other 6 8%
Unknown 29 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 February 2017.
All research outputs
#6,590,084
of 23,313,051 outputs
Outputs from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#1,033
of 4,989 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#124,871
of 422,288 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#95
of 497 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,313,051 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,989 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 422,288 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 497 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.