↓ Skip to main content

Tdp-43 cryptic exons are highly variable between cell types

Overview of attention for article published in Molecular Neurodegeneration, February 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
2 X users
patent
2 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
65 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
98 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Tdp-43 cryptic exons are highly variable between cell types
Published in
Molecular Neurodegeneration, February 2017
DOI 10.1186/s13024-016-0144-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yun Ha Jeong, Jonathan P. Ling, Sophie Z. Lin, Aneesh N. Donde, Kerstin E. Braunstein, Elisa Majounie, Bryan J. Traynor, Katherine D. LaClair, Thomas E. Lloyd, Philip C. Wong

Abstract

TDP-43 proteinopathy is a prominent pathological feature that occurs in a number of human diseases including amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), frontotemporal dementia (FTD), and inclusion body myositis (IBM). Our recent finding that TDP-43 represses nonconserved cryptic exons led us to ask whether cell type-specific cryptic exons could exist to impact unique molecular pathways in brain or muscle. In the present work, we investigated TDP-43's function in various mouse tissues to model disease pathogenesis. We generated mice to conditionally delete TDP-43 in excitatory neurons or skeletal myocytes and identified the cell type-specific cryptic exons associated with TDP-43 loss of function. Comparative analysis of nonconserved cryptic exons in various mouse cell types revealed that only some cryptic exons were common amongst stem cells, neurons, and myocytes; the majority of these nonconserved cryptic exons were cell type-specific. Our results suggest that in human disease, TDP-43 loss of function may impair cell type-specific pathways.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 98 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 98 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 33 34%
Student > Bachelor 7 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 6%
Student > Master 6 6%
Researcher 5 5%
Other 13 13%
Unknown 28 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 27 28%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 21 21%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 1%
Other 4 4%
Unknown 26 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 June 2023.
All research outputs
#2,304,059
of 23,509,982 outputs
Outputs from Molecular Neurodegeneration
#273
of 871 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#50,125
of 422,801 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Molecular Neurodegeneration
#4
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,509,982 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 871 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 422,801 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.