↓ Skip to main content

Epidemiological and clinical correlates of malaria-helminth co-infections in southern Ethiopia

Overview of attention for article published in Malaria Journal, July 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users
facebook
4 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
44 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
153 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Epidemiological and clinical correlates of malaria-helminth co-infections in southern Ethiopia
Published in
Malaria Journal, July 2013
DOI 10.1186/1475-2875-12-227
Pubmed ID
Authors

Andargachew Mulu, Mengistu Legesse, Berhanu Erko, Yeshambel Belyhun, Demise Nugussie, Techalew Shimelis, Afework Kassu, Daniel Elias, Beyene Moges

Abstract

In many areas of the world, including Ethiopia, malaria and helminths are co-endemic, therefore, co-infections are common. However, little is known how concurrent infections affect the epidemiology and/or pathogenesis of each other. Therefore, this study was conducted to assess the effects of intestinal helminth infections on the epidemiology and clinical patterns of malaria in southern Ethiopia where both infections are prevalent.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 153 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 2%
Ethiopia 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 146 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 32 21%
Researcher 26 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 15%
Student > Bachelor 16 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 5%
Other 18 12%
Unknown 30 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 34 22%
Medicine and Dentistry 32 21%
Immunology and Microbiology 16 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 5%
Other 24 16%
Unknown 30 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 April 2016.
All research outputs
#5,927,058
of 24,400,706 outputs
Outputs from Malaria Journal
#1,424
of 5,827 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,473
of 198,491 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Malaria Journal
#18
of 85 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,400,706 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,827 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 198,491 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 85 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.