↓ Skip to main content

Perioperative statin therapy for improving outcomes during and after noncardiac vascular surgery

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
6 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
67 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
172 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Perioperative statin therapy for improving outcomes during and after noncardiac vascular surgery
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009971.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Robert D Sanders, Amanda Nicholson, Sharon R Lewis, Andrew F Smith, Phil Alderson

Abstract

Patients undergoing vascular surgery are a high-risk population with widespread atherosclerosis, an adverse cardiovascular risk profile and often multiple co-morbidities. Postoperative cardiovascular complications, including myocardial infarct (MI), are common. Statins are the medical treatment of choice to reduce high cholesterol levels. Evidence is accumulating that patients taking statins at the time of surgery are protected against a range of perioperative complications, but the specific benefits for patients undergoing noncardiac vascular surgery are not clear.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 172 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Unknown 168 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 29 17%
Researcher 26 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 15%
Other 15 9%
Student > Bachelor 15 9%
Other 35 20%
Unknown 27 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 80 47%
Nursing and Health Professions 16 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 7 4%
Social Sciences 7 4%
Psychology 4 2%
Other 19 11%
Unknown 39 23%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 May 2020.
All research outputs
#4,601,976
of 16,123,692 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,238
of 11,410 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,450
of 158,672 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#78
of 155 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,123,692 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,410 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.9. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 158,672 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 155 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.