↓ Skip to main content
Embed badge What is this page?

Perioperative statin therapy for improving outcomes during and after noncardiac vascular surgery

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
6 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
83 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
222 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike

What is this page?

Summary Policy documents Twitter Dimensions citations
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Perioperative statin therapy for improving outcomes during and after noncardiac vascular surgery
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009971.pub2
Pubmed ID
23824754
Authors

Robert D Sanders, Amanda Nicholson, Sharon R Lewis, Andrew F Smith, Phil Alderson

Abstract

Patients undergoing vascular surgery are a high-risk population with widespread atherosclerosis, an adverse cardiovascular risk profile and often multiple co-morbidities. Postoperative cardiovascular complications, including myocardial infarct (MI), are common. Statins are the medical treatment of choice to reduce high cholesterol levels. Evidence is accumulating that patients taking statins at the time of surgery are protected against a range of perioperative complications, but the specific benefits for patients undergoing noncardiac vascular surgery are not clear.

View on publisher site

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 222 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Unknown 218 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 31 14%
Researcher 28 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 12%
Student > Bachelor 20 9%
Other 15 7%
Other 47 21%
Unknown 54 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 91 41%
Nursing and Health Professions 17 8%
Social Sciences 10 5%
Psychology 7 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 7 3%
Other 26 12%
Unknown 64 29%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 April 2021.
All research outputs
#4,112,633
of 22,713,403 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,566
of 12,313 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,417
of 194,345 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#158
of 304 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,713,403 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,313 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.3. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 194,345 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 304 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.

This page is provided by Altmetric.