↓ Skip to main content

The Case of Dr. Oz: Ethics, Evidence, and Does Professional Self-Regulation Work?

Overview of attention for article published in The AMA Journal of Ethic, February 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

news
17 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
596 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
27 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Case of Dr. Oz: Ethics, Evidence, and Does Professional Self-Regulation Work?
Published in
The AMA Journal of Ethic, February 2017
DOI 10.1001/journalofethics.2017.19.2.msoc1-1702
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jon C Tilburt, Megan Allyse, Frederic W Hafferty

Abstract

Dr. Mehmet Oz is widely known not just as a successful media personality donning the title "America's Doctor(®)," but, we suggest, also as a physician visibly out of step with his profession. A recent, unsuccessful attempt to censure Dr. Oz raises the issue of whether the medical profession can effectively self-regulate at all. It also raises concern that the medical profession's self-regulation might be selectively activated, perhaps only when the subject of professional censure has achieved a level of public visibility. We argue here that the medical profession must look at itself with a healthy dose of self-doubt about whether it has sufficient knowledge of or handle on the less visible Dr. "Ozes" quietly operating under the profession's presumptive endorsement.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 596 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 27 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 4 15%
Professor 3 11%
Student > Bachelor 2 7%
Student > Postgraduate 2 7%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 4%
Other 5 19%
Unknown 10 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 26%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 11%
Philosophy 1 4%
Psychology 1 4%
Mathematics 1 4%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 12 44%