You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Design of an online health-promoting community: negotiating user community needs with public health goals and service capabilities
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Health Services Research, July 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1472-6963-13-258 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Joakim Ekberg, Toomas Timpka, Marianne Angbratt, Linda Frank, Anna-Maria Norén, Lena Hedin, Emelie Andersen, Elin A Gursky, Boel Andersson Gäre |
| Abstract |
An online health-promoting community (OHPC) has the potential to promote health and advance new means of dialogue between public health representatives and the general public. The aim of this study was to examine what aspects of an OHPC that are critical for satisfying the needs of the user community and public health goals and service capabilities. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 75% |
| Singapore | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 95 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Iran, Islamic Republic of | 1 | 1% |
| Ireland | 1 | 1% |
| Luxembourg | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 92 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 18% |
| Researcher | 12 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 12% |
| Other | 7 | 7% |
| Other | 16 | 17% |
| Unknown | 20 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 15 | 16% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 12 | 13% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 11% |
| Psychology | 9 | 9% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 18 | 19% |
| Unknown | 26 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 July 2013.
All research outputs
#13,386,515
of 22,713,403 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#4,606
of 7,595 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#102,436
of 194,350 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#71
of 126 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,713,403 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,595 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 194,350 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 126 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.