The history of sex research: Is “sex” a useful category?

Overview of attention for article published in Cell, March 2024

Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

news: 5 news outlets
blogs: 2 blogs

twitter: 422 X users
facebook: 1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley: 16 Mendeley

Summary News Blogs X Facebook

So far, Altmetric has seen 474 X posts from 422 X users, with an upper bound of 1,909,770 followers.

The history of sex research: Is “sex” a useful category? - ScienceDirect https://t.co/Ic6kPrMtMM

09 May 2024

Reply Repost Favourite

@RebeccaSelberg @Flamman_ @LAretakis @p_lindenfors Här är dock ett färskt exempel på en sociolog - inte genusvetare - som ifrågasätter värdet av biologiskt kön i medicinska studier. Enligt min uppfattning har problemet varit det motsatta: biologiskt kön

07 May 2024

Reply Repost Favourite

The history of sex research: Is “sex” a useful category?: Cell https://t.co/xlPfJGFkZO

29 Apr 2024

Reply Repost Favourite

RT @lecanardnoir: She bases her claim that the "scientific literature' has "no clear consensus" on these ramblings of a historian and socio…

28 Apr 2024

Reply Repost Favourite

This page shows the most recent X posts that mention this research output.

Click here to find out how to access more activity, including 470 additional X posts.