You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Three isn't the magic number
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Medicine, July 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1038/nm0713-807 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Michael Houghton |
| Abstract |
Most research prizes in biomedicine, from the Nobels to the Laskers, are restricted to three recipients. But in an age of big science, when much larger teams are generally needed to make important research discoveries, all the people who provide seminal contributions deserve to be awarded. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 83 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 14 | 17% |
| United States | 13 | 16% |
| Canada | 4 | 5% |
| Spain | 3 | 4% |
| Norway | 3 | 4% |
| Sweden | 2 | 2% |
| Portugal | 1 | 1% |
| Pakistan | 1 | 1% |
| Curaçao | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 13 | 16% |
| Unknown | 28 | 34% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 53 | 64% |
| Scientists | 18 | 22% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 7 | 8% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 9 | 90% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 30% |
| Professor | 2 | 20% |
| Researcher | 2 | 20% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 10% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 1 | 10% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 1 | 10% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 30% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 20% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 10% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 10% |
| Neuroscience | 1 | 10% |
| Other | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 1 | 10% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 65. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 October 2020.
All research outputs
#630,101
of 24,694,993 outputs
Outputs from Nature Medicine
#1,860
of 9,055 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,678
of 199,148 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Medicine
#15
of 115 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,694,993 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,055 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 104.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 199,148 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 115 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.