The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Response of CRH system in brain and gill of marine medaka to seawater acidification
|
---|---|
Published in |
Fish Physiology and Biochemistry, March 2024
|
DOI | 10.1007/s10695-024-01332-7 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Haijin Chen, Yaoyi Feng, Jinghui Cui, Xiaojie Wang |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 4 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 50% |
Unspecified | 1 | 25% |
Student > Master | 1 | 25% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unspecified | 1 | 25% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 25% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 25% |
Psychology | 1 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 March 2024.
All research outputs
#6,560,831
of 25,593,129 outputs
Outputs from Fish Physiology and Biochemistry
#58
of 938 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,946
of 185,413 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Fish Physiology and Biochemistry
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,593,129 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 938 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 185,413 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.