↓ Skip to main content

Management of cardiogenic shock: a narrative review

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Intensive Care, March 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#14 of 1,293)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
432 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
104 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Management of cardiogenic shock: a narrative review
Published in
Annals of Intensive Care, March 2024
DOI 10.1186/s13613-024-01260-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Driss Laghlam, Sarah Benghanem, Sofia Ortuno, Nadia Bouabdallaoui, Stephane Manzo-Silberman, Olfa Hamzaoui, Nadia Aissaoui

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 432 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 104 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 104 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 10 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 7%
Unspecified 6 6%
Student > Bachelor 6 6%
Researcher 6 6%
Other 13 13%
Unknown 56 54%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 29 28%
Unspecified 6 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 2%
Other 6 6%
Unknown 55 53%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 246. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 September 2024.
All research outputs
#163,703
of 26,756,610 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Intensive Care
#14
of 1,293 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,563
of 356,274 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Intensive Care
#1
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,756,610 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,293 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 356,274 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.