You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Warfarin initiation nomograms for venous thromboembolism
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2013
|
DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd007699.pub2 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Garcia P, Ruiz W, Loza Munarriz C |
Abstract |
Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a common condition in hospital patients. Considerable controversy is ongoing regarding optimal initial warfarin dosing for patients with acute deep venous thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE). Achieving a therapeutic international normalized ratio (INR) with warfarin as soon as possible is important because this minimizes the duration of parenteral medication necessary to attain immediate anticoagulation, and it potentially decreases the cost and inconvenience of treatment. Although a 5-mg loading-dose nomogram tends to prevent excessive anticoagulation, a 10-mg loading-dose nomogram may achieve a therapeutic INR more quickly. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Colombia | 1 | 5% |
Unknown | 19 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 6 | 30% |
Student > Master | 3 | 15% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 10% |
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 10% |
Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 10% |
Other | 3 | 15% |
Unknown | 2 | 10% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 15 | 75% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 5% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 5% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 5% |
Unknown | 2 | 10% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 July 2013.
All research outputs
#20,195,877
of 22,713,403 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#11,990
of 12,313 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#170,414
of 194,246 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#312
of 322 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,713,403 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,313 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.3. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 194,246 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 322 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.