You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Comparison between the jugular and subclavian vein as insertion site for central venous catheters: microbiological aspects and risk factors for colonization and infection
|
---|---|
Published in |
Brazilian Journal of Infectious Diseases, April 2003
|
DOI | 10.1590/s1413-86702003000200008 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Geraldo Sadoyama, Paulo Pinto Gontijo Filho |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Netherlands | 1 | 2% |
Brazil | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 40 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 6 | 14% |
Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 14% |
Student > Bachelor | 5 | 12% |
Student > Master | 4 | 10% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 7% |
Other | 11 | 26% |
Unknown | 7 | 17% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 23 | 55% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 10% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 5% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 2% |
Computer Science | 1 | 2% |
Other | 3 | 7% |
Unknown | 8 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 October 2017.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Brazilian Journal of Infectious Diseases
#149
of 809 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,903
of 63,302 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Brazilian Journal of Infectious Diseases
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 809 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 63,302 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.