↓ Skip to main content

Addressing wild turkey population declines using structured decision making

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Wildlife Management, February 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#50 of 1,418)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
twitter
10 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
41 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Addressing wild turkey population declines using structured decision making
Published in
Journal of Wildlife Management, February 2017
DOI 10.1002/jwmg.21220
Authors

Kelly F. Robinson, Angela K. Fuller, Michael V. Schiavone, Bryan L. Swift, Duane R. Diefenbach, William F. Siemer, Daniel J. Decker

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Unknown 40 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 22%
Student > Master 9 22%
Researcher 6 15%
Unspecified 5 12%
Other 5 12%
Other 7 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 19 46%
Environmental Science 12 29%
Unspecified 7 17%
Computer Science 1 2%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 2%
Other 1 2%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 45. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 October 2019.
All research outputs
#401,195
of 13,877,566 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Wildlife Management
#50
of 1,418 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,902
of 348,700 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Wildlife Management
#3
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,877,566 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,418 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 348,700 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.