↓ Skip to main content

The case for a dingo reintroduction in Australia remains strong: A reply to Morgan et al., 2016

Overview of attention for article published in Food Webs, February 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
52 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
18 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The case for a dingo reintroduction in Australia remains strong: A reply to Morgan et al., 2016
Published in
Food Webs, February 2017
DOI 10.1016/j.fooweb.2017.02.001
Authors

Thomas M. Newsome, Aaron C. Greenville, Mike Letnic, Euan G. Ritchie, Christopher R. Dickman

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 52 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 1 6%
Unknown 17 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 28%
Student > Master 3 17%
Unspecified 3 17%
Student > Bachelor 2 11%
Other 2 11%
Other 3 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 10 56%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 22%
Unspecified 3 17%
Social Sciences 1 6%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 32. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 February 2017.
All research outputs
#383,277
of 11,426,211 outputs
Outputs from Food Webs
#2
of 50 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,184
of 321,934 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Food Webs
#1
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 11,426,211 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 50 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one scored the same or higher as 48 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 321,934 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them