You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The case for a dingo reintroduction in Australia remains strong: A reply to Morgan et al., 2016
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Food Webs, March 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.fooweb.2017.02.001 |
| Authors |
Thomas M. Newsome, Aaron C. Greenville, Mike Letnic, Euan G. Ritchie, Christopher R. Dickman |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 43 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 16 | 37% |
| Canada | 2 | 5% |
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| Sweden | 1 | 2% |
| Brunei Darussalam | 1 | 2% |
| Côte d'Ivoire | 1 | 2% |
| Japan | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 20 | 47% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 32 | 74% |
| Scientists | 10 | 23% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 25 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 6 | 23% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 12% |
| Researcher | 3 | 12% |
| Other | 2 | 8% |
| Other | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 6 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 38% |
| Environmental Science | 9 | 35% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 6 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 October 2018.
All research outputs
#1,568,634
of 25,593,129 outputs
Outputs from Food Webs
#25
of 227 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,301
of 324,977 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Food Webs
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,593,129 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 227 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 324,977 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them