↓ Skip to main content

Alexander Technique Lessons, Acupuncture Sessions or usual care for patients with chronic neck pain (ATLAS): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial

Overview of attention for article published in Trials, July 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users
facebook
11 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
334 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Alexander Technique Lessons, Acupuncture Sessions or usual care for patients with chronic neck pain (ATLAS): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
Published in
Trials, July 2013
DOI 10.1186/1745-6215-14-209
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hugh MacPherson, Helen E Tilbrook, Stewart J Richmond, Karl Atkin, Kathleen Ballard, Martin Bland, Janet Eldred, Holly N Essex, Ann Hopton, Harriet Lansdown, Usman Muhammad, Steve Parrott, David Torgerson, Aniela Wenham, Julia Woodman, Ian Watt

Abstract

Chronic neck pain is a common condition in the adult population. More research is needed to evaluate interventions aiming to facilitate beneficial long-term change. We propose to evaluate the effect of Alexander Technique lessons and acupuncture in a rigorously conducted pragmatic trial with an embedded qualitative study.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 334 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Unknown 329 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 56 17%
Researcher 40 12%
Student > Bachelor 37 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 32 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 31 9%
Other 50 15%
Unknown 88 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 89 27%
Nursing and Health Professions 57 17%
Psychology 36 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 3%
Social Sciences 9 3%
Other 37 11%
Unknown 97 29%