↓ Skip to main content

Simulation of normal and pathological gaits using a fusion knowledge strategy

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, July 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
64 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Simulation of normal and pathological gaits using a fusion knowledge strategy
Published in
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, July 2013
DOI 10.1186/1743-0003-10-73
Pubmed ID
Authors

Fabio Martínez, Christian Cifuentes, Eduardo Romero

Abstract

: Gait distortion is the first clinical manifestation of many pathological disorders. Traditionally, the gait laboratory has been the only available tool for supporting both diagnosis and prognosis, but under the limitation that any clinical interpretation depends completely on the physician expertise. This work presents a novel human gait model which fusions two important gait information sources: an estimated Center of Gravity (CoG) trajectory and learned heel paths, by that means allowing to reproduce kinematic normal and pathological patterns. The CoG trajectory is approximated with a physical compass pendulum representation that has been extended by introducing energy accumulator elements between the pendulum ends, thereby emulating the role of the leg joints and obtaining a complete global gait description. Likewise, learned heel paths captured from actual data are learned to improve the performance of the physical model, while the most relevant joint trajectories are estimated using a classical inverse kinematic rule. The model is compared with standard gait patterns, obtaining a correlation coefficient of 0.96. Additionally,themodel simulates neuromuscular diseases like Parkinson (phase 2, 3 and 4) and clinical signs like the Crouch gait, case in which the averaged correlation coefficient is 0.92.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 64 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Iran, Islamic Republic of 2 3%
Germany 2 3%
Ukraine 1 2%
Switzerland 1 2%
Unknown 58 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 16 25%
Researcher 8 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 13%
Student > Bachelor 6 9%
Lecturer 2 3%
Other 9 14%
Unknown 15 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 22 34%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 14%
Sports and Recreations 3 5%
Computer Science 2 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 3%
Other 7 11%
Unknown 19 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 October 2020.
All research outputs
#14,755,656
of 22,714,025 outputs
Outputs from Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
#779
of 1,278 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#115,623
of 194,295 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
#6
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,714,025 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,278 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 194,295 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.