↓ Skip to main content

Extended late Holocene relative sea-level histories for North Carolina, USA

Overview of attention for article published in Quaternary Science Reviews, March 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
10 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
35 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Extended late Holocene relative sea-level histories for North Carolina, USA
Published in
Quaternary Science Reviews, March 2017
DOI 10.1016/j.quascirev.2017.01.012
Authors

Andrew C. Kemp, Jessica J. Kegel, Stephen J. Culver, Donald C. Barber, David J. Mallinson, Eduardo Leorri, Christopher E. Bernhardt, Niamh Cahill, Stanley R. Riggs, Anna L. Woodson, Ryan P. Mulligan, Benjamin P. Horton

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Ireland 1 3%
Unknown 34 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 26%
Student > Master 6 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 14%
Professor 4 11%
Student > Bachelor 3 9%
Other 5 14%
Unknown 3 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 18 51%
Environmental Science 7 20%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Mathematics 1 3%
Psychology 1 3%
Other 3 9%
Unknown 4 11%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 March 2021.
All research outputs
#3,312,976
of 17,520,458 outputs
Outputs from Quaternary Science Reviews
#928
of 2,932 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#85,027
of 366,257 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Quaternary Science Reviews
#21
of 61 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,520,458 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,932 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 366,257 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 61 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.