↓ Skip to main content

The effectiveness of workplace dietary modification interventions: A systematic review

Overview of attention for article published in Preventive Medicine, November 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (67th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
5 tweeters
patent
4 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
98 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
285 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The effectiveness of workplace dietary modification interventions: A systematic review
Published in
Preventive Medicine, November 2013
DOI 10.1016/j.ypmed.2013.06.032
Pubmed ID
Authors

F. Geaney, C. Kelly, B.A. Greiner, J.M. Harrington, I.J. Perry, P. Beirne

Abstract

To evaluate the effectiveness of workplace dietary modification interventions alone or in combination with nutrition education on employees' dietary behaviour, health status, self-efficacy, perceived health, determinants of food choice, nutrition knowledge, co-worker support, job satisfaction, economic cost and food-purchasing patterns.

Twitter Demographics

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 285 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 281 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 66 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 33 12%
Researcher 30 11%
Student > Bachelor 22 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 18 6%
Other 52 18%
Unknown 64 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 53 19%
Social Sciences 32 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 30 11%
Psychology 19 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 18 6%
Other 58 20%
Unknown 75 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 September 2023.
All research outputs
#3,713,182
of 23,394,907 outputs
Outputs from Preventive Medicine
#1,528
of 4,701 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,398
of 215,212 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Preventive Medicine
#32
of 97 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,394,907 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,701 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 215,212 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 97 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.